05/06/30

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Contents | Director | Case 1 | Case 2 | Case 3 | Review 1 | Rad1 | Rad2 | EKG1

AMR - June 2005

   

 

 

Case Report -
A 25-year-old Female with Neck Pain


James E. Conti, MD

The patient is a 25-year-old Caucasian female with a past medical history of extensive sarcoidosis for many years, for which she is currently treated with Methotrexate 10mg weekly and Prednisone 1mg daily, Protein C deficiency with documented DVTs and two episodes of pulmonary emboli, currently being treated with Coumadin 5mg daily, and status post SA node ablation in 1999 for tachycardia with DDD pacemaker insertion. The patient presented to her primary care doctor, stating that over the past three months she has been experiencing worsening discomfort at the base of her neck that is associated with bending over and lying down. Symptoms are also present when the patient is laughing. She also recently noticed that the veins in her neck are protruding and the earlier discomfort has progressed to a feeling of pain at the base of her neck. It has come to the point were she is sleeping in the upright position because the discomfort has become so noticeable. Patient also admits having discomfort in both arms and hands, she states they have become swollen over the past few months and they appear very “puffy” to her. Patient denies any difficulty swallowing, or loss of range of motion in her neck. She also denies any pain in her upper extremities as well as loss of range of motion. The patient denies shortness of breath or chest pain, recent weight loss, or paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea; orthopnea is pain-related.

Past Medical History / Past Surgical History

  1. Sarcoidosis with documented lung involvement
  2. Recent CT scan with contrast demonstrated significant adenopathy, and pulmonary changes
  3. Status post node biopsies for diagnosis of Sarcoidosis
  4. Protein C deficiency with documented episodes of DVTs and 2 episodes of pulmonary emboli
  5. Inappropriate sinus Tachycardia
  6. Status post SA node ablation 5 years ago with DDD pacemaker insertion

Social History / Family History

The patient is single, lives at home with her parents, and denies any smoking or alcohol consumption. Mother has Factor V Leiden deficiency.

Hospital Course

Due to the progression of her symptoms, she presented to the emergency room. Her examination is as follows.

Blood pressure was 122/60 mmHg, heart rate was 76 beats per minute, respiratory rate was 16. Temperature was normal and afebrile. In general, the patient appeared her age, lying down comfortably, talkative, in no acute distress.

HEENT: PERL, no erythema of throat, no lymphadenopathy.

NECK: No initial signs of JVD, but when applying pressure over liver, JVD was present with slow resolution of distention; no lymphadenopathy.

CHEST/HEART: S1,S2 were appreciated with no S3, regular rate and rhythm, no murmurs.

ABDOMEN: Normal bowel sounds, soft, non-tender, non-distended, no masses.

RECTAL: Hemoccult negative.

EXTEMITIES: Upper extremities appear swollen, no pitting edema of upper or lower extremities, no gross varicosities, no cyanosis, no clubbing.

SKIN : No rashes or lesions.

NEURO: Alert and oriented, no obvious focal deficits.

Labs

No electrolyte abnormalities were observed.

WBC Count 7.8 thousand/cmm
Hemoglobin 14.0 gm/dL
Hematocrit 41.4 %
Platelet Count 223 thousand/uL
Prothrombin Time 14.9 seconds (elevated)
INR 1.5
PTT 51.7 seconds (elevated)

A CT scan showed significant pretrachea, precarinal, and AP window adenopathy, and pulmonary changes with multiple nodular densities present in the periphery of both lung fields. No extensive adenopathy in the region of the superior vena cava (SVC) right atrial junction. Venogram was also performed from the left arm, which showed focal occlusion of the SVC at the right atrial junction; no venographic evidence of other thrombus in the area; no intraluminal filling defects consistent with the clot. EKG showed sinus rhythm at 80 beats per minute with normal PR, QRS, and QT interval.

The patient was then admitted to the CCU and IV thrombolytics (TPA) were administered for 12 hours at 2mg per hour. Eptifibatide 75mg/100ml and Heparin 25,000u/500ml were also administered.

The next morning, balloon angioplasty was successfully performed, decreasing the SVC occlusion from 100% to 20%. The patient was then continued on aspirin and clopidogrel. She also remained on heparin therapy until a therapeutic INR of 2.5 to 3.5 was achieved using with oral anticoagulation with warfarin 5mg daily. In the days following the catherization procedure the patient began to notice a decrease in the swelling of her upper extremities as well as the discomfort in her neck. She was discharged on hospital day 6, with continued use of plavix, warfarin, as well as previously prescribed medications; she was instructed to follow up with her cardiologist in 4 weeks.

See SVC before balloon angioplasty. (Microsoft Windows Media player required)

See SVC after balloon angioplasty. (Microsoft Windows Media Player required)

DISCUSSION

Obstruction of blood flow in the superior vena cava results in symptoms and signs of Superior Vena Cava (SVC) syndrome. Obstruction can either be caused by a blockage within the vessel itself, such as thrombosis, or from external compression of the SVC by pathologic processes involving the right lung, lymph nodes, and other mediastinal structures. In this patient’s case, she had three different possible causes for SVC obstruction. Either from manifestation of sarcoidosis, in which a granuloma or lyphadenopathy in the region of the SVC could cause external compression; Protein C deficiency leading to direct thrombosis of SVC; or the indwelling central venous pacemaker lead.

When an obstruction of flow through the SVC develops, venous collaterals begin to form. The rate of the obstruction will determine the body’s ability to adapt in forming these collaterals. In conditions in which the rate of obstruction occurs more rapidly such as malignant disease, patients may develop symptoms of SVC syndrome in weeks to months as compared to fibrosing mediastinitis due to infection which may take years to develop symptoms. The most commonly reported symptom is dyspnea. Patients also frequently complain of facial swelling or head fullness, a symptom that may be exacerbated by bending over or lying down; cough, arm edema, and cyanosis. The most common finding on physical exam is venous distention in the neck and chest wall, and facial edema.

Lung cancer is the most common malignant cause of SVC syndrome, followed by lymphoma; together they represent 94% of cases of SVC syndrome. Other malignancies that metastasize to the mediastinum can also be responsible. In both cases approximately 2-4% of patients with either lung cancer or lymphoma will develop SVC syndrome, through external compression of the SVC. Nonmalignant disorders account for the remaining 6-15% of SVC syndrome. Of which fibrosing mediastinitis most commonly due to Histoplasmosis infection comprises 50% of these cases; other infectious causes include tuberculosis, actinomycosis, aspergillosis, blastomycosis, and Bancroftian filariasis. Other nonmalignant causes include nocardiosis, sclerosing cholangitis, sarcoidosis, and post-radiation fibrosis. Thrombosis accounts for a significant percentage of the nonmalignant causes of SVC syndrome and is actually the fastest growing population of new cases. This is mainly due to the increasing demand of pacemaker insertions, in which indwelling catheters or lines cause turbulent flow leading to thrombus formation. Finally, patients who have hypercoagulable conditions such as Protein C or S deficiency, Factor V Leiden deficiency and many others are at higher risk for thrombus formation.

Diagnosis most commonly can be made by chest x-ray, due to the fact that the majority of cases are caused by external compression from a solid tumor or lymph node. Other radiographic studies used are CT scan and venography. Venography is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of SVC syndrome. It is helpful for showing the location and the degree of blockage; although it has limitations on helping with identifying the primary cause of the obstruction unless it is purely an intravascular process. MRI can be used for patients with contrast allergies.

Treatment is directed toward the underlying disease causing SVC syndrome. Radiation and/or chemotherapy are effective in patients with cancer. Malignancies that have high rates of response to chemotherapy, will usually show rapid regression of SVC syndrome. Thrombolytics play a role in patients who are eligible and endovascular therapy such as intraluminal stenting and balloon angioplasty can be used for patients with either refractory disease or who need immediate symptomatic improvement.


REFERENCES

1. Schechter, MM. The superior vena cava syndrome. AM J Med Sci 1954: 227:46.

2. Chen, JC, Bongard, F, Klein, SR. A contemporary perspective on superior vena cava syndrome. AM J Surg 1990; 160:270.

3. Abnerna , A. Approach to the patient who presents with superior vena cava obstruction. Chest 1993; 103:394S.

4. Salsli, M, Clifton, EE. Superior vena caval obstruction in carcinoma of the lung. NY State J Med 1969; 69:2875.

5. Swchowengert, CG, Suyemoto, R, Main, BF. Granulomatous and fibrous mediastinitis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969: 365.

6. Roberts, JR, Bueno, R, Sugarbaker, DJ. Multimodality treatment of malignant superior vena caval syndrome. Chest 1999; 116:835.

7. Greenburg, S, Klonski, R, Daniels, J. Treatment of superior vena cava thrombosis with recombinant type tissue plasminogen activator. Chest 1991; 99:1298.