04/05/03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Contents | Director | One | Two | Topic 1 | Topic 2 | EKG | Rad 1 | Rad 2

AMR - October 2002

   

 

 

Review -
Antiphospholipid Syndrome


Timothy P. Collins, MD

 

The lupus anticoagulants, anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I antibodies are autoimmune antibodies against phospholipids or plasma proteins bound to anionic phospholipids and comprise a clinical paradox of thromboembolic disease called the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Classically, it is a reflex lab test ordered as a part of any hypercoagulable work-up. In this review, I hope to simplify this complex autoimmune phenomenon to the basic epidemiology, clinical manifestations, treatment and the diagnostic criteria as recently proposed by the International Consensus and American College of Hematology.

It has been reported that antiphospholipid antibodies are found among young, apparently healthy individuals at a prevalence of 1 to 5% for both anticardiolipin antibodies and the lupus anticoagulant (Petri et al.). As with other autoimmune phenomenon, the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies increases with age and with coexistent chronic disease. Not surprisingly, the prevalence of antiphospholipid antibodies is considerably higher in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (Avcin et al.).

Several theories exist in an attempt to explain the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which antiphospholipid antibodies promote thrombosis: activated endothelial cells, oxidant-mediated injury to the vascular endothelium, direct interference in the phospholipid mediated regulation of coagulation and a mechanism similar to the paradoxical thrombosis of heparin induced thrombocytopenia (Levine et al.). The common pathology, however, is a characteristic thrombotic microangiopathy with minimal vascular or perivascular inflammation. This change in the architecture of both small and large arteries (also present in other disorders such as hemolytic-uremic syndrome and scleroderma) is the nidus for in situ thrombosis from which emboli can originate and/or lodge.  The clinical and laboratory diagnostic criteria as proposed by the International Consensus Statement are as follows: (Levine et al.)


Clinical Criteria

  1. Vascular Thrombosis. One or more clinical episodes of arterial, venous or small vessel thrombosis occurring in any tissue or organ.

  2. Complications of Pregnancy. One or more unexplained death of morphologically normal fetuses at or after the 10th week of gestation; or one or more premature births of morphologically normal neonates at or before the 34th week of gestation; or three or more unexplained consecutive spontaneous abortions before the 10th week of gestation.


Laboratory Criteria

  1. Anticardiolipin antibodies. IgG or IgM antibodies present in moderate or high levels in the blood in two or more occasions at least 6 weeks apart.

  2. Lupus anticoagulant antibodies. Lupus anticoagulant antibodies detected in the blood on two or more occasions at least 6 weeks apart, according to the guidelines of the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis.


Thrombosis can occur in virtually any vascular bed in the body, thus making the clinical manifestations and differential diagnosis extremely broad. Patients can present with evidence of vascular insult to any organ.  Venous thromboses are more common than arterial thromboses in the antiphospholipid syndrome. In fact, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is the presenting clinical manifestation in 32% of people diagnosed with APS and antiphospholipid antibodies can be detected in 10% of all patients with a venous thrombosis (Ginsberg et al). The most common site of DVT is the calf, but renal, hepatic, axillary, subclavian, or retinal veins or the vena cava can be involved. The most common site of arterial thrombosis is the cerebral vessels, but coronary, renal and mesenteric arteries have been noted.

There is some evidence that correlates the levels and coexistence of antiphospholipid antibodies with incidence of events. For example, one moderately large-scale study found that venous thrombosis occurred in 44% of patients with high titers of anticardiolipin antibodies, 29% with low titers and 10% in those without the antibodies. Patients with SLE and anticardiolipin antibodies also have an increased incidence of thromboses as evidenced by a study of 1400 lupus patients (Cervera et al.). A small subset of patients, estimated at 0.8%, fall into the unfortunate category of catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome. Widespread thrombotic disease, with visceral damage was the initial manifestation in three quarters of patients studied. When present, this disorder is fatal almost 50% of the time, even with anticoagulant treatment (Levine et al.).

Standard therapy for thrombosis in patients with APS consists of heparin followed by warfarin. The treatment of pregnant patients remains controversial but usually consists of a combination of heparin and aspirin. It has been well documented in clinical trials that an INR between 2.6 and 3.0 reduced the incidence of thrombotic events by up to 75% whereas low intensity warfarin or aspirin alone proved no benefit (Cervera et al). Prophylactic therapy in patients who are known to have antiphospholipid antibodies but no episodes of thromboses is an important related treatment issue. Therapy in this patient population is not generally recommended unless there is a noted high level of anticardiolipin antibodies or the patient has another risk factor for thrombosis such as SLE. In the latter group of patients, hematologists usually recommend aspirin 81mg per day (Petri et al.).

In conclusion, it is obvious that APS is a potentially lethal yet commonly occurring autoimmune phenomenon. Close attention to clinical evidence for thromboembolic disease in conjunction with the proposed diagnostic guidelines can hopefully prevent significant morbidity and mortality on the wards and in the ambulatory setting.


References

  1. Avcin, T. et al. Recent Advances in Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Lupus 2002; 11:4

  2. Petri, M. Pathogenesis and Treatment of the Antiphospholipid Syndrome. Med Clin North Am 1997; 81:151

  3. Cervera, R. et al. Antiphospholipid Syndrome: clinical and immunologic manifestations and patterns of disease expression in a cohort of 1000 patients. Arthritis Rheum 2002; 46:1019

  4. Ginsberg, JS, et al. Antiphospholipid antibodies and venous thromboembolism. Blood 1995; 86:3685

  5. Levine, LS, et al. The Antiphospholipid Syndrome. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:752.