04/05/03

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

Contents | Director | One | Two | Topic 1 | Topic 2 | EKG | Rad 1 | Rad 2

AMR - October 2002

   

 

 

Case Report -
A 77-year-old Caucasian woman with worsening dyspnea


Robert Wang, MD


A 77-year-old Caucasian woman presented with progressively worsening dyspnea over the past two days. She and her family attributed this to possible pneumonia since she had cough productive of light tan sputum and some "low-grade" fevers. She had been treated for right lower lobe pneumonia two months prior to admission as an outpatient. She also had fluid in her lung that her cardiologist was "drying out."

She had hypertension and valvular disease that she could not elaborate on, but denied history of myocardial infarction or diabetes mellitus. She denied a smoking history and she had no other pertinent history.

On examination she was afebrile, with blood pressure of 150/90mmHg, pulse of 90 beats/min, respiratory rate of 24/min and oxygen saturation of 87% on room air. Lung exam demonstrated decreased breath sounds on the right up to the mid lung-field with dullness to percussion with the left lung clear to auscultation. Cardiac exam was significant for a III/VI systolic ejection murmur at the right sternal border, II/VI systolic murmur at the apex, and an apical heave. Other than 1+ bilateral pitting edema of the lower extremities, the exam is otherwise unremarkable.

An extended metabolic profile, including electrolytes and liver enzymes, as well as a complete blood count were normal. A chest roentgen showed a large, right-sided effusion with possible infiltrate. EKG was consistent with left ventricular hypertrophy, with no evidence of ST segment changes. Lateral decubitus films were requested, and showed that the effusion freely layered.

A therapeutic thoracentesis was performed. One liter of fluid was removed and sent for analysis that demonstrated an LDH and protein level, both less than half of the serum values, and a cell count that had few white as well as red blood cells. The fluid was deemed a transudate, and as that the patient had neither liver nor renal failure, CHF was assumed the etiology of her effusion. Once a report of the patient's most recent echocardiogram was obtained from her cardiologist, it was clear that the patient had indeed developed left sided heart failure secondary to critical aortic stenosis (AS). She had an aortic valve orifice of 0.9 cm2 and mitral regurgitation.


Discussion

There are two etiologies of aortic stenosis (AS). Congenitally, there is abnormal formation of the aortic valve during embryologic development of the heart. The aortic valve normally has three leaflets, but in cases of abnormal development there is fusion or hypertrophy of leaflets. The abnormal valves may have from one to three leaflets, and due to asymmetry, the orifice is decreased in size. Single leaflet valves have the greatest amount of stenosis, and patients are usually symptomatic in infancy. In valves with multiple leaflets, the turbulent flow of blood through an incongruous orifice leads to fibrosis, calcification and stenosis.

The second etiology of AS is a conglomerate of disease process that result in damage and calcification of the valve, and therefore lead to acquired AS. These include rheumatic, calcific, atherosclerotic and senile AS. Rheumatic, calcific and atherosclerotic AS are self-explanatory; senile AS, however, is not as straightforward. Analysis of senile AS valves shows a chronic inflammatory process of the leaflets. The leaflets are infiltrated by macrophages and T-lymphocytes, and the inflammatory process results in immobilization and ultimately calcification of the valve. Infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae has been proposed as an initiator of the inflammatory process.

The natural history of AS is a gradual decrease in size of the valve orifice, during which, the patient is usually without symptoms. Once there is severe stenosis or signs of left sided heart failure, the patient will experience symptoms of the disease process. The cardinal manifestations of AS are angina pectoris, syncope, exertional dyspnea, and, ultimately, heart failure. Angina is a result of the increased oxygen demand of the hypertrophied myocardium, and may be contributed to by partial obstruction of the coronary arteries by the abnormal valve. Syncope and exertional dyspnea are attributed to fixed cardiac output in the face of vasodilatation.

On physical examination there is usually a decreased or narrowed pulse pressure; however early in the disease process there may be an increased pulse pressure when the stenosis is mild and associated with aortic regurgitation. Auscultation of the heart yields a late peaking systolic murmur that is often confused with a pan-systolic murmur, but is differentiated by the ending of the AS murmur at S2. The aortic component of the second heart sound is diminished with calcified leaflets, but can be snappy in congenital AS. Murmur volume varies with the severity of the AS and amount of heart failure involved, and it is important to look for signs of left-sided heart failure. The murmur is heard best at the right sternal border, but also radiates to the base of the heart and may be confused with a mitral regurgitant murmur. An AS murmur does not radiate to the apex and is limited to the base of the heart, and therefore may be distinguished by careful auscultation from MR.

Asymptomatic AS showed be followed with echocardiograms every two years, and those with mild obstruction have no exercise restrictions. Those with severe AS should be followed with echocardiography every 6 to 12 months and should not participate in vigorous activities. Digitalis may be used in those with dilation of the left ventricle or reduced ejection fraction. Diuretics maybe used in those with fluid accumulation like our patient, but caution is required for AS is a preload dependent lesion and hypovolemia can result in a low cardiac output state. Medical management of AS includes antibiotic prophylaxis.

Surgery is required when the calculated effective orifice is less than 0.8 cm2 or 0.5 cm2 /m2 body surface area (BSA), or when the patient is symptomatic. This is true in adults or children. Children have the benefit of flexible valves that can be treated with balloon valvuloplasty. Aortic valve replacement is the treatment of choice in adults.

The patient presented in the opening case did not wish to have any surgical intervention. Survival in her case is no greater than 18 months.


References

  1. Behrman: Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, 16th ed.

  2. Braunwald: Heart Disease: A Textbook of Cardiovascular Medicine, 6th ed.

  3. Carabello, BA. Aortic Stenosis. N Engl J Med 2002; 346:677-682, Feb 28, 2002.

  4. Otto CM: Valvular Heart Disease. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1999, p. 203.